USPTO serial 73630897
ULTIMATE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STINE, DAVID
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ULTIMATE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CHARLES R. MIRANDA
CHARLES R MIRANDA60 MAIN STBRIDGEPORT, CT 06602UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | KNIVES EXCLUDING ELECTRIC KNIVES, MACHINES KNIVES, AND SURGICAL KNIVES AND SCISSORS | ABANDONED | Oct 27, 1986 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 6, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 25, 1989 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 18, 1989 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Feb 17, 1989 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Sep 1, 1988 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jul 20, 1988 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 18, 1988 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 30, 1987 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 21, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 24, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |