USPTO serial 73630905
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARK I. PEROFF
MARK I PEROFF LIDDY, SULLIVAN, GALWAY, ET ALSTE 160380 FIFTH AVENEW YORK, NY 10011| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | TOILETRY ARTICLES - NAMELY, COMPACTS, POWDER PUFFS, BOXED POWDER; EYELASH CURLING TONGS, MANICURE SETS; EAR PICKS | ABANDONED | — |
| 018 | HANDBAGS, BOSTON BAGS, BRIEFCASES, SHOULDER BAGS, SATCHELS, TRUNKS, SUITCASES, PURSES, PASSPORT CASES, CARD CASES, WALLETS MADE OF LEATHER, IMITATION LEATHER AND CLOTH | ABANDONED | — |
| 024 | NON-WOVEN, WOVEN, KNITTED AND FELT FABRIC, QUILTS, QUILT COVERS, QUILT BAGS, PILLOW COVERS, SHEETS, BLANKETS, TOWELS, HANDKERCHIEFS, AND WASH CLOTHS | ABANDONED | — |
| 025 | CLOTHING - NAMELY, SUITS, COATS, DRESSES, SKIRTS, TROUSERS, SWEATERS, SHIRTS, BLOUSES, UNDERWEAR, VESTS, PAJAMAS, HOSIERY, GLOVES, SCARVES, NECKERCHIEFS, NECKTIES, SUPPORT HOSIERY, ARMBANDS, GARTERS, SUSPENDERS, BELTS, BOOTS, SHOES, SLIPPERS, HATS AND CAPS | ABANDONED | — |
| 026 | BUTTONS MADE OF BONE, EMBROIDERS, LACE, RIBBONS, HAIR BAND | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 19, 1991 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 2, 1990 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 18, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 18, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 7, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 6, 1989 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 30, 1988 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 16, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 24, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 16, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 13, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |