USPTO serial 73631068
GRO-CON
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GRO-CON?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
HINSPERGERS POLY INDUSTRIES LIMITED
MISSISSAUGA, ONTARIO, CA
Other trademarks owned by HINSPERGERS POLY INDUSTRIES LIMITED
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
RUPERT J. BRADY
RUPERT J BRADY BRADY, O'BOYLE & GATES920 CHEVY CHASE BLDG5530 WISCONSIN AVECHEVY CHASE, MD 20815Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 022 | GROUND COVERS OF FLEXIBLE PLASTIC MATERIAL; FLEXIBLE GROUND COVERS TO PREVENT THE GROWTH OF VEGETATION; PLASTIC GROUND CLOTH TON CONTROL SOILEROSION; AND POROUS PLASTIC GROUND CLOTH TO SEPARATE INFERIOR UNDERSOIL FROM TOP SOIL | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 3, 1988 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 3, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 3, 1988 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 26, 1987 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 25, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 12, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |