USPTO serial 73631213
THE ULTIMATE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STINE, DAVID
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with THE ULTIMATE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
RALPH W. KALISH
RALPH W KALISH KALISH & GILSTER500 N BROADWAY STE 1200ST LOUIS, MO 63102UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | KITCHEN HAND TOOLS, NAMELY, MEAT TENDERIZERS, SPATULAS, COOKING FORKS, DRAINING SPOONS, BASTING SPOONS, SLOTTED SPOONS, HOUSEHOLD SHEARS, AND MIXING SPOON SETS | ABANDONED | — |
| 021 | KITCHEN UTENSILS, NAMELY ICE CREAM SCOOPS, WHISKS, EGG BEATERS, AND CAKE COOLING RACKS | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 20, 1991 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 20, 1991 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 28, 1991 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 6, 1990 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 12, 1989 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 12, 1989 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 12, 1989 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 22, 1989 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 8, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 25, 1987 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 14, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 25, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |