USPTO serial 73631344
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
ST. LOUIS, MO
ST. LOUIS, MO
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | MEDICAL HEALTH CARE MANAGEMENT NEWSLETTER | ABANDONED | Oct 6, 1986 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 10, 1990 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 10, 1990 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 7, 1989 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 11, 1989 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 7, 1989 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 9, 1989 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 7, 1989 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 21, 1988 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 29, 1988 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 6, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 14, 1988 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jan 13, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 24, 1987 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 27, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 2, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 6, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |