USPTO serial 73631575
THE GAME WITH NO NAME
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GLYNN, GERALD
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with THE GAME WITH NO NAME?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
EAGLESHAM, GLASGOW, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
TODD DEVEAU
TODD DEVEAU NEWTON, HOPKINS & ORMSBYTWO MIDTOWN PLZ STE 14001360 PEACHTREE ST N EATLANTA, GA 30309-3209Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COIN OPERATED AMUSEMENT MACHINDS; COIN OPERATED VIDEO GAME MACHINES; VIDEO GAME COMPUTER PROGRAMS; PRINTED CIRCUIT BOARDS; MAGNETIC MEDIA FOR RECORDING COMPUTER PROGRAMS, NAMELY, MAGNETIC PAPER, MAGNETRC TAPE, MAGNETIC CARDS, AND FLOPPY DISCS | ABANDONED | — |
| 028 | COIN OPERATED AMUSEMENT MACHINES; COIN OPERATED VIDEO GAME MACHINES; VIDEO GAME COMPUTER PROGRAMS; ELECTRONIC GAMES AND PARTS THEREFOR; CHESS GAMES AND BOARDS | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 3, 1989 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 25, 1988 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 21, 1988 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 17, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 14, 1988 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 21, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 24, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 21, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 17, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 13, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |