Drawing for CECIL ADAMS

USPTO serial 73631921

CECIL ADAMS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MATTHEWS, AMOS
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CECIL ADAMS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

RICHARD H. COMPERE

RICHARD H COMPERE WILLIAN BRINKS OLDS HOFER GILSON & LIONEP O BOX 10395CHICAGO, IL 60610UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016NEWSPAPER COLUMNABANDONEDFeb 2, 1973

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 26, 1989EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Mar 29, 1989ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Mar 29, 1989EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Nov 10, 1988CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Jun 29, 1988EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Dec 8, 1987CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Sep 28, 1987CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 14, 1987CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 13, 1987CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 14, 1987CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 4, 1987CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 11, 1987CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 5, 1987DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance