USPTO serial 73631972
BACIO DI AMORE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 1500089Status 713
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 16, 1988
- Examiner
- HOWELL, TOM
- Law office
- FILE DESTROYED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BACIO DI AMORE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
SAN FRANCISCO, CA
SAN FRANCISCO, CA
SAN FRANCISCO, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
WILLIAM P. HOLM
WILLIAM P HOLM HOLM KRISEL FRIED KESSNER & O'HARATHE GRAYBAR BLDG420 LEXINGTON AVENEW YORK, NY 10170Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | PERFUMES AND COLOGNES | SECTION 18 - CANCELLED | Sep 22, 1986 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 5, 1992 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 17, 1991 | C18. | CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL | — |
| May 3, 1991 | CANG | CANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 26, 1990 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 16, 1988 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 24, 1988 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 22, 1988 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 29, 1988 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 11, 1988 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 31, 1987 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Sep 4, 1987 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 4, 1987 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 27, 1987 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 10, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 2, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |