Drawing for KIWI LAGER NEW ZEALAND PREMIUM LAGER

USPTO serial 73632016

KIWI LAGER NEW ZEALAND PREMIUM LAGER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
—
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with KIWI LAGER NEW ZEALAND PREMIUM LAGER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

LAWRENCE E. ABELMAN

LAWRENCE E ABELMAN ABELMAN FRAYNE REZAC & SCHWAB708 THIRD AVENEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
032BEERABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 12, 1990PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Nov 6, 1989PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Aug 23, 1989ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 23, 1989DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 13, 1989CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jan 11, 1989DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 5, 1989DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 22, 1988CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Oct 8, 1987CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Sep 25, 1987ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 24, 1987PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Aug 28, 1987PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Feb 10, 1987CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 23, 1987DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance