USPTO serial 73632203
FABLICE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FABLICE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
HIGASHIKU NAGOYA, AICHI PREFECTURE, JP
NISHIKU, NAGOYA, JP
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
EDWARD A. LEHMAN
EDWARD A LEHMAN HILL VAN SANTEN STEADMAN CHIARA, ET AL70TH FL SEARS TWRCHICAGO, IL 60606UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 8, 1989 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Mar 29, 1989 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 15, 1989 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Jan 30, 1989 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 7, 1988 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 7, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 3, 1988 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 25, 1987 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 6, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 2, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 17, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |