USPTO serial 73632693
GMI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GMI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
VANCOUVER, B.C., CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
PHILLIP H. SMITH
PHILLIP H SMITH MERCHANT GOULD SMITH EDELL WELTER, ET AL1600 MIDWEST PLZ BLDG801 NICOLLET MALLMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | ELECTRONIC MARINE PRODUCTS, NAMELY, DEPTH SOUNDERS | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 20, 1989 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Jun 19, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 10, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 21, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 19, 1988 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 14, 1988 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 17, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 17, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 8, 1987 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 26, 1987 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 18, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 18, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 12, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |