USPTO serial 73632697
INTERNATIONAL TELESIS GROUP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SALEMI, DOMINICK
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with INTERNATIONAL TELESIS GROUP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
WILLIAM J. ROBINSON
WILLIAM J ROBINSON GRAHAM & JAMES801 S FIGUEROA ST 14TH FLLOS ANGELES, CA 90017-5554UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | VOICE AND DATA TELECOMMUNICATIONS CONSULTING SERVICES | ABANDONED | Jan 17, 1986 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 16, 1995 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 15, 1995 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 15, 1995 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 15, 1995 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Aug 15, 1995 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Apr 12, 1995 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 11, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 10, 1994 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 20, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 30, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 22, 1993 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 14, 1992 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 6, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 16, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 11, 1992 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 28, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 3, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 15, 1990 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 11, 1990 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 6, 1990 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 20, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 15, 1988 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 28, 1988 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 10, 1988 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 10, 1988 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 16, 1988 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 13, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 8, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 17, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |