USPTO serial 73633234
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
INTERNATIONAL VIDEO SYSTEMS, INC.
LOS ANGELES, CA
INTERNATIONAL VIDEO SYSTEMS, INC.
LOS ANGELES, CA
INTERNATIONAL VIDEO SYSTEMS, INC.
LOS ANGELES, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
PAUL R. WYLIE
PAUL R WYLIE15200 SUNSET BLVDPACIFIC PALISADES, CA 90272UNITED STATESCopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 18, 1995 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Mar 14, 1989 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 20, 1988 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 21, 1988 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 20, 1988 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 20, 1988 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 22, 1988 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 22, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 31, 1988 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 13, 1988 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 12, 1988 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Dec 7, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 7, 1987 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 29, 1987 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 18, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 26, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |