USPTO serial 73633589
ADAPTIVE COMPRESSION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 1560285Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 10, 1989
- Examiner
- HAMILTON, MICHAEL
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with ADAPTIVE COMPRESSION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
GREGORY P. KAIHOI
GREGORY P KAIHOI FREDRIKSON & BYRON, PA1100 INTERNATIONAL CTR900 SECOND AVE SMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-3397Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | HEARING AIDS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by TELEX COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by TELEX COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by TELEX COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Similar marks named ADAPTIVE COMPRESSION
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 27, 2014 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Mar 10, 2009 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 20, 2006 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 18, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 30, 1996 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| May 31, 1996 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 31, 1996 | CAND | CANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 25, 1996 | RRPR | RESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION | — |
| Feb 28, 1996 | PRA8 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 | — |
| May 1, 1995 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Dec 2, 1994 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 10, 1989 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Aug 15, 1989 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 11, 1989 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 1989 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 7, 1989 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 28, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 25, 1988 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 11, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 21, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 3, 1988 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 7, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 25, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 26, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 18, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 10, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |