USPTO serial 73633944
ULTRA-TWO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STRASER, RICHARD
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ULTRA-TWO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JAMES SOMMAR
210 BROAD STLANSDALE, PA 19446UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | PHARMACEUTICAL GELS OR SOLUTIONS CONTAINING FLUORIDE USED, DISPENSED OR PRESCRIBED BY DENTAL PROFESSIONALS AND USED ON TEETH | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 1, 1989 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 24, 1989 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 10, 1989 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 10, 1989 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 29, 1988 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 3, 1988 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 16, 1988 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 21, 1988 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 19, 1988 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 10, 1988 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 24, 1987 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Sep 17, 1987 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 12, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 9, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |