USPTO serial 73634285
SACCARDI CHIANTI CLASSICO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SACCARDI CHIANTI CLASSICO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JANE F. MCGLEW COLLEN
ATT: ARTHUR H SEIDEL SEIDEL, GONDA, LAVOGNA & MONACO, PCTWO PENN CTR PLZ STE 1800PHILADELPHIA, PA 19102UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 033 | CHIANTI WINE | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 10, 1990 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 10, 1990 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 12, 1989 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 1, 1988 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 23, 1988 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 22, 1988 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 19, 1987 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 9, 1987 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 5, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 26, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 3, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 3, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |