Drawing for SIMPLY GREAT

USPTO serial 73634366

SIMPLY GREAT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PRICE, JERRY
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SIMPLY GREAT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JULIUS R. LUNSFORD, JR.

JULIUS R LUNSFORD JR HURT RICHARDSON GARNER TODD & CADENHEAD1100 PEACHTREE CTR HARRIS TWR233 PEACHTREE ST N EATLANTA, GA 30043

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030BREADSABANDONEDNov 10, 1986

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 11, 1988PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Dec 21, 1987PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Sep 3, 1987CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Jun 30, 1987CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 10, 1987CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 23, 1987CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 11, 1987CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 4, 1987DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 25, 1987DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance