Drawing for OPTI SEED

USPTO serial 73635248

OPTI SEED

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
—
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with OPTI SEED?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

PERLA M. KUHN

STEWARD J BELLUS KUHN MULLER AND BAZERMAN1412 BROADWAYNEW YORK, NY 10018UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
031AGRICULTURAL AND HORTICULTURAL PRODUCTS, NAMELY, VEGETABLE AND FLOWER SEEDS; LIVE PLANTSABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 13, 1988ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Mar 8, 1988PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 12, 1988NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 6, 1988NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 4, 1988CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 30, 1987CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Oct 15, 1987CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 20, 1987CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 19, 1987CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 11, 1987DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance