USPTO serial 73635377
COCONUT JOE CLOTHING COMPANY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with COCONUT JOE CLOTHING COMPANY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
PAUL HERBERT
PAUL HERBERT RICHES, MCKENZIE & HERBERTSTE 29002 BLOOR ST ETORONTO, ON M4W 3J5Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | MEN'S AND CHILDREN'S CLOTHING, NAMELY, SHOES, BOOTS, SLIPPERS, THONGS, SANDALS, SOCKS, PANTS, TROUSERS, UNDERWEAR, SHIRTS, T-SHIRTS, TOPS, SWEATSHIRTS, JOGGING SUITS, WARM-UP SUITS, SWEATERS, JACKETS, NECK WARMERS, SCARVES, HATS, GLOVES, BELTS, SUSPENDERS, CAPS, TOQUES, SWEATSUITS, SWEATPANTS, SWEAT TOPS | ABANDONED | Sep 17, 1986 |
| 042 | OPERATION OF A RETAIL STORE SELLING MEN'S AND CHILDREN'S CLOTHING AND FOOTWEAR | ABANDONED | Sep 17, 1986 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 17, 1989 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 17, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 18, 1988 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 31, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 3, 1988 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 17, 1987 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 22, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 18, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |