Drawing for IDIS

USPTO serial 73636953

IDIS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GLYNN, GERALD
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with IDIS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

A. YATES DOWELL, JR.

A YATES DOWELL JR DOWELL & DOWELLSTE 7052001 JEFFERSON DAVIS HWYARLINGTON, VA 22202

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009DIGITAL IMAGING EQUIPMENT FOR USE IN THEMEDICAL FIELD, NAMLEY COMPUTERS, KEYBOARDS, STYLII, FRAME STORES IN THE NATURE OF MEMORIES FOR STORING PICTURE FRAMES, DISKS, COMPUTER PROGRAMS, DISPLAY UNITS, PROCESSING UNITS, PROGRAMMED READ ONLY MEMORY DEVICESABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 29, 1989EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Aug 29, 1989EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Jul 25, 1989ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
May 5, 1989CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Apr 11, 1989JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Apr 10, 1989CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 10, 1989EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Apr 9, 1989CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 9, 1988CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 15, 1988CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 17, 1988CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 4, 1988CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Feb 16, 1988CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 11, 1987CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 24, 1987CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 23, 1987CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 4, 1987CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 9, 1987CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 6, 1987DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 5, 1987DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance