USPTO serial 73638315
S'PORT-AID
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STRASER, RICHARD
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with S'PORT-AID?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MICHAEL YAKIMO, JR.
MICHAEL YAKIMO JR819 WALNUT404 SCARRITT ARCADEKANSAS CITY, MO 64106Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | ORTHOPEDIC SOFT GOODS USED IN THE SPORTS INJURY INDUSTRY, NAMELY KNEE SUPPORT, CARTILAGE KNEE SUPPORT, CANVAS ANKLE SPLINT, BACK SUPPORT, CERVICAL COLLAR, SACRAL SUPPORT, ABDOMINAL SUPPORT, POSTURE SUPPORT, WRIST SUPPORT, ARM SLING AND ELBOW WRAP | ABANDONED | Oct 10, 1986 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 25, 1989 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 25, 1989 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 14, 1988 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Oct 26, 1988 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 5, 1988 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 24, 1988 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 22, 1988 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 9, 1988 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Oct 13, 1987 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 21, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 17, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 11, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |