USPTO serial 73638354
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
GARY M. POLUMBUS
GARY M POLUMBUS HOLLAND & HART555 SEVENTEENTH STSTE 2900, P O BOX 8749DENVER, CO 80201| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | SPOT AND STAIN REPELLENT FOR UPHOLSTRY, RUGS AND CARPETING | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 1988 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 13, 1988 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 23, 1988 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 8, 1987 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 16, 1987 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 15, 1987 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 20, 1987 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 8, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 17, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 11, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |