USPTO serial 73639066
VARITY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with VARITY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
TORONTO, ONTARIO, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ROBERT L. FARRIS
ROBERT L FARRISP O BOX 322DETROIT, MI 48232UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | BUSINESS SERVICES INCLUDING, MANAGEMENT CONSULTING SERVICES SUCH AS CONSULTATION AND ASSISTANCE IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF SHORT-RANGE AND LONG-RANGE BUSINESS STRATEGIES AND CONSULTATION TOWARD THE IMPLEMENTATION OF SUCH STRATEGIES; CONSULTATIVE ASSISTANCE FOR THE RELOCATION OF COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL ACTIVITIES, IN SITE PLANNING, AND IN THE PREPARATION AND DELIVERY OF COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL REAL PROPERTY PROJECT PLANNING, AND PROPERTY PROJECT PLANNING; AND SALE OF REAL ESTATE FACILITIES | ABANDONED | Jul 30, 1986 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 8, 1987 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 8, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 21, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 24, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |