USPTO serial 73639129
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
BERNARD R. GANS
BERNARD R GANS POMS, SMITH, LANDE & ROSE2121 AVE OF THE STARSSTE 1400LOS ANGELES, CA 90067| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | RETAIL CLOTHING STORE SERVICES | ABANDONED | Jan 12, 1985 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 24, 1989 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 10, 1989 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 10, 1989 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 29, 1988 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 7, 1988 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 6, 1988 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 27, 1988 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 18, 1988 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 16, 1987 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 16, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 2, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 28, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 24, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |