USPTO serial 73639580
THE BELMONT METHOD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 17, 1988
- Examiner
- FOSTER, STEVEN
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with THE BELMONT METHOD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
MONTEREY, CA
MONTEREY, CA
CARMEL, CA
CARMEL, CA
MONTEREY, CA
CARMEL, CA
CARMEL, CA
MONTEREY, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
F. DAVID LARIVIERE
CHARLES N BELMONTP O BOX 22253CARMEL, CA 93922UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | DRY CLEANING SERVICES FOR CARPETING AND UPHOLSTERY | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 7, 1986 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by BELMONT, NORIKO SHIRONISHI
- Other trademarks owned by BELMONT, NORIKO SHIRONISHI
- Other trademarks owned by BELMONT, CHARLES N.
- Other trademarks owned by BELMONT, CHARLES N.
- Other trademarks owned by BELMONT, NORIKO SHIRONISHI
- Other trademarks owned by BELMONT, CHARLES N.
- Other trademarks owned by BELMONT, CHARLES N.
- Other trademarks owned by BELMONT, NORIKO SHIRONISHI
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Similar marks named THE BELMONT METHOD
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 21, 2009 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jun 9, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 17, 1994 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| May 12, 1994 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| May 17, 1988 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Mar 8, 1988 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 2, 1988 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 22, 1988 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 11, 1988 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 28, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 28, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 31, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |