USPTO serial 73639606
MADE IN JAPAN A TERIYAKI EXPERIENCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 12, 1991
- Examiner
- CARRUTHERS, SUE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with MADE IN JAPAN A TERIYAKI EXPERIENCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
MADE IN JAPAN JAPANESE RESTAURANTS LIMITED
MISSISSAUGA, ONTARIO L5J 1K5, CA
Other trademarks owned by MADE IN JAPAN JAPANESE RESTAURANTS LIMITED
MADE IN JAPAN JAPANESE RESTAURANTS LIMITED
MISSISSAUGA, ONTARIO L5J 1K5, CA
Other trademarks owned by MADE IN JAPAN JAPANESE RESTAURANTS LIMITED
MADE IN JAPAN JAPANESE RESTAURANTS LIMITED
MISSISSAUGA, ONTARIO L5J 1K5, CA
Other trademarks owned by MADE IN JAPAN JAPANESE RESTAURANTS LIMITED
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DONALD A. KAUL
DONALD A KAUL BROWNSTEIN ZEIDMAN AND SCHOMERSTE 9001401 NEW YORK AVE N WWASHINGTON, DC 20005Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | RESTAURANT SERVICES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by MADE IN JAPAN JAPANESE RESTAURANTS LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by MADE IN JAPAN JAPANESE RESTAURANTS LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by MADE IN JAPAN JAPANESE RESTAURANTS LIMITED
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named MADE IN JAPAN A TERIYAKI EXPERIENCE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 18, 1998 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Nov 12, 1991 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 20, 1991 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 19, 1991 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 11, 1991 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 1, 1991 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jan 4, 1991 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 16, 1990 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 24, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 21, 1989 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 29, 1988 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 12, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 21, 1988 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 20, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 20, 1987 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 9, 1987 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 2, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 5, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 7, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 7, 1987 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 31, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |