USPTO serial 73639700
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JULIUS FISHER
JULIUS FISHER MCAULAY, FISHER, NISSEN, ET AL261 MADISON AVENEW YORK, NY 10016UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | VIDEO CASSETTE FILMS AND CINEMATOGRAPHIC FILMS | ABANDONED | — |
| 016 | PRINTED PUBLICATIONS, NAMELY, FICTION AND NON-FICTION MAGAZINE AND BOOKS, COMIC BOOKS; PAINTING AND COLORING SETS FOR CHILDREN AND CRAYONS | ABANDONED | — |
| 028 | TOYS, GAMES AND PLAYTHINGS, NAMELY, DOLLS, DOLL CLOTHING, DOLL FURNISHINGS AND DOLL ACCESSORIES, TOY ACTION FIGURES, TOY ACTION VEHICLES AND ACCESSORIES, BOARD GAMES, PUZZLES, ROAD RACING SETS, TOY MOVIE VIEWERS AND PROJECTORS, TOY MODELING COMPOUND, STUFFED TOYS, TOY MUSICAL INSTRUMENTS, TOY HAIR STYLING SETS AND TOY CONSTRUCTION KITS | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 26, 1993 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 17, 1992 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 3, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 13, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 10, 1991 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 19, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 6, 1990 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 13, 1989 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 4, 1988 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 11, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 28, 1987 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 25, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 17, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |