USPTO serial 73639817
CUVEE VIEILLES VIGNES DOMAINE COMTE GEORGES DE VOGUE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 9, 1990
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with CUVEE VIEILLES VIGNES DOMAINE COMTE GEORGES DE VOGUE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
SOCIETE CIVILE D'EXPLOITATION DU DOMAINE COMTE GEORGES DE VOGUE
GEVREY-CHAMBERTIN, FR
Other trademarks owned by SOCIETE CIVILE D'EXPLOITATION DU DOMAINE COMTE GEORGES DE VOGUE
SOCIETE CIVILE D'EXPLOITATION DU DOMAINE COMTE GEORGES DE VOGUE
GEVREY-CHAMBERTIN, FR
Other trademarks owned by SOCIETE CIVILE D'EXPLOITATION DU DOMAINE COMTE GEORGES DE VOGUE
SOCIETE CIVILE D'EXPLOITATION DU DOMAINE COMTE GEORGES DE VOGUE
GEVREY-CHAMBERTIN, FR
Other trademarks owned by SOCIETE CIVILE D'EXPLOITATION DU DOMAINE COMTE GEORGES DE VOGUE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
HENRY W. LEEDS
HENRY W LEEDS DRINDER, BIDDLE & REATH1500 K ST NWSTE 1100WASHINGTON, DC 20005-1209Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 033 | WINES AND BRANDIES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SOCIETE CIVILE D'EXPLOITATION DU DOMAINE COMTE GEORGES DE VOGUE
- Other trademarks owned by SOCIETE CIVILE D'EXPLOITATION DU DOMAINE COMTE GEORGES DE VOGUE
- Other trademarks owned by SOCIETE CIVILE D'EXPLOITATION DU DOMAINE COMTE GEORGES DE VOGUE
- Other trademarks in Class 033
- Similar marks named CUVEE VIEILLES VIGNES DOMAINE COMTE GEORGES DE VOGUE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 15, 2016 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Dec 5, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 9, 2001 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Mar 9, 2001 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Oct 11, 2000 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Oct 8, 1996 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Aug 9, 1996 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Oct 9, 1990 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 17, 1990 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 16, 1990 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 17, 1990 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 17, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 10, 1990 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 14, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 11, 1989 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Apr 13, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 3, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 6, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 23, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 15, 1988 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 13, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 10, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 13, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 23, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 11, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 5, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |