Drawing for UNISAFE

USPTO serial 73639966

UNISAFE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
MANDIR, FREDERICK
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with UNISAFE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

J. RODMAN STEELE, JR.

J RODMAN STEELE JR ECKERT, SEAMANS, CHERIN, & MELLOT515 N FLAGLER DR400 NORTHBRIDGE CTRWEST PALM BEACH, FL 33401

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001FIRE EXTINGUISHING COMPOSITIONSABANDONED
009FIRE EXTINGUISHERSABANDONED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 19, 1991ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED
Aug 19, 1991CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 1, 1991CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Mar 27, 1991CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED
Mar 25, 1991CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 20, 1990CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Jun 16, 1990DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jan 31, 1990CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED
Sep 1, 1989UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED
Aug 29, 1989CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED
Feb 9, 1989CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Jul 21, 1988CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Jun 30, 1988CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 23, 1988CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED
Dec 14, 1987CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Dec 11, 1987ZZZZALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN
Nov 16, 1987CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED
Oct 1, 1987CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 31, 1987CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 26, 1987DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance