Drawing for OREGON FRUIT PRODUCTS

USPTO serial 73640543

OREGON FRUIT PRODUCTS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 1527140Status 800Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Feb 28, 1989
Examiner
DATRI, ALAN
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.

Status 800: Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection.

Need help with OREGON FRUIT PRODUCTS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Christopher D. Erickson

Christopher D. Erickson Tonkon Torp LLP888 SW FIFTH AVE., SUITE 1600Portland, OR 97204UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029CANNED FRUITS AND BERRIES AND FRUIT-BASED PIE FILLINGACTIVEMay 1, 1937

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 25, 2020CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Sep 25, 2020TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 25, 2020ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 25, 2020REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 25, 2020COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Feb 13, 2019CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Feb 13, 2019COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Jan 17, 2019NA89NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED—
Jan 17, 2019RNL2REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS)The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active.
Jan 17, 201989AGREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTEDThe USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary.
Jan 15, 2019E89RTEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED—
Feb 28, 2018REM2COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED—
Nov 23, 2011ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Oct 27, 2011ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 27, 2011REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jun 11, 2009RNL1REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS)The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active.
Jun 11, 200989AGREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTEDThe USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary.
Mar 11, 2009ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Mar 4, 2009PLGLASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL—
Feb 27, 2009E89RTEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED—
Jul 30, 2008CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Feb 6, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 17, 1995C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Feb 27, 1995815FREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED—
Feb 28, 1989R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Dec 6, 1988PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 19, 1988NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 5, 1988NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 23, 1988CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 8, 1988CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jun 20, 1988CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 28, 1988CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 27, 1987CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 17, 1987NAUDNOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - MAILED—
Aug 20, 1987CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 16, 1987CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 26, 1987DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance