USPTO serial 73640573
THE ORIGINAL CAFEWARE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ABATE CANDICE A
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with THE ORIGINAL CAFEWARE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
BRUCE E. LILLING
BRUCE E LILLING LILLING & GREENSPAN123 MAIN STWHITE PLAINS, NY 10601UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | PORCELAIN, STONEWARE AND EARTHENWARE DINNERWARE--NAMELY, PLATES, BOWLS, CUPS, SAUCERS, SERVING DISHES, CHAFFING DISHES, PLATTERS, CREAMER, SUGAR BOWL, SALT AND PEPPER SHAKERS AND CANDLE HOLDERS; MUGS AND STEINS; AND GLASSWARE, NAMELY, WATER GLASSES, DOUBLE OLD-FASHIONED GLASSES, HIGH BALL GLASSES, MALTED MILK SHAKE GLASSES, ICED TEA GLASSES, ROOT BEER FLOAT GLASSES, HOT FUDGE SUNDAE DISHES AND WATER PITCHERS | ABANDONED | Oct 30, 1986 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 30, 1988 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 25, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 1, 1987 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 26, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 13, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 24, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |