Drawing for SCUM SUCKER

USPTO serial 73641012

SCUM SUCKER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HANKIN, NANCY
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SCUM SUCKER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ROBERT C. TUCKER

ROBERT C TUCKER ROY, KIESEL, AARON & WP O BOX 15928BATON ROUGE, LA 70895UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011SKIMMING MECHANISM FOR SKIMMING FLOATING MATERIALS FROM WASTE WATER FLOWABANDONEDMay 16, 1986

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 25, 1989EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Feb 24, 1989ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Feb 24, 1989EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Nov 29, 1988CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Nov 23, 1988DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 30, 1988EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jun 10, 1988CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Dec 9, 1987CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 13, 1987CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 10, 1987CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 27, 1987DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance