USPTO serial 73641444
DELI-FARE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DELI-FARE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
STEVE ROSENBLATT
STEVE ROSENBLATT PRAVEL, GAMBRELL, HEWITT & KIMBALLTENTH FL1177 W LOOP SHOUSTON, TX 77027Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | PREPARED MEATS | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 31, 2024 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 28, 1989 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 17, 1988 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 16, 1988 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jul 19, 1988 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 15, 1988 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 23, 1988 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 23, 1988 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 18, 1988 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Mar 3, 1988 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 3, 1988 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 23, 1987 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 29, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 15, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 15, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 31, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |