USPTO serial 73641486
VITA-SHOP: THE SPECIALIST IN VITALITY PRODUCTS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MARKS, MARTIN H.
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VITA-SHOP: THE SPECIALIST IN VITALITY PRODUCTS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
MONTREAL, QUEBEC, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ROBIC
ROBIC MONTREAL55 ST JACQUES, QC H2Y 3X2CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | OPERATION OF RETAIL STORES SPECIALIZED IN PRODUCTS WHICH HELP MAINTAIN THE FEELING AND APPEARANCE OF VITALITY SUCH AS HAIR, SKIN PRODUCTS, VITAMINS AND OLIGO-ELEMENTS | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 2, 1992 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Feb 26, 1992 | NAUD | NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - MAILED | — |
| Oct 17, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 9, 1991 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Feb 22, 1991 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 24, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 1, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 12, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 23, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 17, 1989 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 31, 1988 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 11, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 2, 1988 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 21, 1988 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 26, 1987 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 17, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 11, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 9, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |