USPTO serial 73641534
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
SIMOR L. MOSKOWITZ
SIMOR L MOSKOWITZ FLEIT, JACOBSON, COHN & PRICE1217 E ST N WWASHINGTON, DC 20004-1998UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | METAL MANUAL VALVES, NAMELY, BALL VALVES, GATE VALVES, ANGLE VALVES AND GAS BALL VALVES AND METAL VALVE CAPS, METAL COUPLINGS, METAL NIPPLES, METAL ADAPTERS, METAL REDUCERS | ABANDONED | Dec 17, 1986 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 27, 1990 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Feb 27, 1990 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 11, 1989 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| May 22, 1989 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| May 22, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 14, 1988 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 27, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 10, 1988 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 15, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 11, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 11, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 18, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |