USPTO serial 73641536
BULAR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WENDEL, HELEN R.
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BULAR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
EDWARD A. MEILMAN
EDWARD A MEILMAN OSTROLENK, FABER, GERB & SOFFEN260 MADISON AVENEW YORK, NY 10016-2482UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | PHARMACEUTICAL PREPARATIONS FOR USE AS AN ANTI-INFLAMMATORY AND ANTI-ARTHRITIC AND FOR TREATMENT OF RADIATION CYSTITIS, CONTAINING THE ACTIVE SUBSTANCE ORGOTEIN (ALSO KNOWN AS SUPEROXIDE DISMUTASE) | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 25, 1989 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 25, 1989 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 30, 1989 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 3, 1988 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 10, 1987 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 9, 1987 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 11, 1987 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 27, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 25, 1987 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 18, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 2, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 1, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |