USPTO serial 73642065
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
RICHARD C. LITMAN
RICHARD C LITMAN CRYSTAL CITY STATIONLITMAN LAW OFFICE LTDP O BOX 15035ARLINGTON, VA 22215-0035| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | NON-WOVEN MATERIAL USED BY MANICURISTS FOR CLEANING NAILS AND BRUSHES, FOR REMOVING MAKE-UP, AND AS A FACIAL CLEANSING CLOTH | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 9, 1987 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Jul 9, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 29, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 16, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 1, 1987 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 27, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |