USPTO serial 73642137
ARCHITECTURAL LIGHTING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 1485757Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 19, 1988
- Examiner
- MATTHEWS, AMOS
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with ARCHITECTURAL LIGHTING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
SAN FRANCISCO, CA
NEW YORK, NY
SPRINGFIELD, OR
WASHINGTON, DC
SPRINGFIELD, OR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard W. Young
Richard W. Young Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP191 North Wacker DriveSuite 3700Chicago, IL 60606Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | MAGAZINE DEALING WITH ILLUMINATION OF BUILDINGS AND STRUCTURES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by MILLER FREEMAN, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by GRALLA PUBLICATIONS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by ASTER PUBLISHING CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by HANLEY-WOOD, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by CASSANDRA PUBLISHING CORP.
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Similar marks named ARCHITECTURAL LIGHTING
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 7, 2022 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jan 24, 2009 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Oct 24, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Oct 22, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 22, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 24, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 13, 2006 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Oct 9, 1994 | PRA8 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 | — |
| Oct 4, 1994 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Apr 19, 1994 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Mar 23, 1990 | C.7C | NEW CERTIFICATE UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 9, 1990 | PRAM | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7 | — |
| Feb 7, 1990 | RRPR | RESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION | — |
| Nov 14, 1989 | PRAM | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7 | — |
| Sep 7, 1989 | C.7F | REQUEST FOR NEW CERTIFICATE FILED | — |
| Apr 19, 1988 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Feb 18, 1988 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 22, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 30, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 13, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 5, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 2, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 27, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |