USPTO serial 73642207
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
WEST BRUNSWICK, VICTORIA, AU
WEST BRUNSWICK, VICTORIA, AU
WEST BRUNSWICK, VICTORIA, AU
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOAN G. YUDOFF
JOAN G YUDOFF961 VAN NUYS STSAN DIEGO, CA 92109UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | T-SHIRTS, SWEATSHIRTS, HATS, CAPS, SHOES, TRACKSUITS, SOCKS, JEANS, PANTS, TROUSERS, COATS, RAINCOATS, SCARFS, UNDERWEAR, OVERALLS, SHIRTS, VESTS, DRESSES, SINGLETS, SHOES, BOATS AND SLIPPERS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 26, 1997 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Nov 20, 1990 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 28, 1990 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 28, 1990 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 22, 1990 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 15, 1990 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 8, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 30, 1989 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 21, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 31, 1989 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 16, 1988 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 22, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 19, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 13, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 31, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |