USPTO serial 73642614
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
75015 PARIS, FR
KEWASKUM, WI
KEWASKUM, WI
LE CORDON BLEU INTERNATIONAL B.V.
AMSTERDAM, NL
1102 BR AMSTERDAM ZUIDOOST, NL
1102 BR AMSTERDAM ZUIDOOST, NL
1102 BR AMSTERDAM ZUIDOOST, NL
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOSEPH D. LEWIS
JOSEPH D. LEWIS BARNES & THORNBURG LLP1717 Pennsylvania Ave NW, STE 500WASHINGTON, DC 20006UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | NON-ELECTRIC COOKING UTENSILS NAMELY, SAUCE PANS AND [, SKILLETS, DUTCH OVENS, ] CASSEROLE COOKERS [, COOKING RACKS AND CUPS TO FIT THE RACKS, STRAINERS, AND COVERS ] | ACTIVE | Oct 19, 1960 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 26, 2018 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 26, 2018 | RNL2 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Sep 26, 2018 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Sep 26, 2018 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 20, 2018 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 29, 2011 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE - ADDRESS UPDATED | — |
| Jun 23, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 28, 2008 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Oct 28, 2008 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Oct 28, 2008 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 13, 2008 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| May 17, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 14, 2004 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Apr 12, 2004 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Apr 12, 2004 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 14, 1998 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 20, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 19, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 28, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 22, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 12, 1995 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 11, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 22, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 17, 1994 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 13, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 31, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 5, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 8, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 8, 1988 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 19, 1988 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 19, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 9, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 18, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 10, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 27, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 5, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 27, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |