Drawing for TAILORED AND BEAUTIFUL

USPTO serial 73642667

TAILORED AND BEAUTIFUL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
—
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TAILORED AND BEAUTIFUL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

FRED A. KEIRE

FRED A KEIRE CURTIS, MORRIS & SAFFORD530 FIFTH AVENEW YORK, NY 10036UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025WOMEN'S CLOTHING, NAMELY - DRESSES, JACKETS, SKIRTS, BLOUSES AND PANTSABANDONEDJan 16, 1987

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 2, 1990DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 17, 1990ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jan 17, 1990EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jan 17, 1990EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Aug 24, 1989CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Jan 13, 1989CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Nov 23, 1988DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 18, 1988DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 14, 1988DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 14, 1988JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Oct 14, 1988EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Mar 1, 1988CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 20, 1987CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 22, 1987DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance