USPTO serial 73642769
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
CONSEIL INTERPROFESSIONNEL DU VIN DE BORDEAUX
JUILLET, BORDEAUX, FR
Other trademarks owned by CONSEIL INTERPROFESSIONNEL DU VIN DE BORDEAUX
CONSEIL INTERPROFESSIONNEL DU VIN DE BORDEAUX
JUILLET, BORDEAUX, FR
Other trademarks owned by CONSEIL INTERPROFESSIONNEL DU VIN DE BORDEAUX
CONSEIL INTERPROFESSIONNEL DU VIN DE BORDEAUX
JUILLET, BORDEAUX, FR
Other trademarks owned by CONSEIL INTERPROFESSIONNEL DU VIN DE BORDEAUX
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
EDWARD G. FENWICK, JR.
H JOHN CAMPAIGN GRAHAM, CAMPAIGN & MCCARTHY, PC36 W 44TH STNEW YORK, NY 10036-8178UNITED STATESCopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 20, 2008 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Apr 27, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 14, 1994 | C15P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Mar 11, 1994 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Jul 17, 1990 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 26, 1989 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 15, 1988 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 22, 1987 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 20, 1987 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 15, 1987 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 3, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 3, 1987 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 3, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 31, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 23, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |