USPTO serial 73643367
NOBILITY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DATRI, ALAN
- Law office
- TMEO LAW OFFICE 3 - REVIEW AND AMENDMENT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NOBILITY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
WILLIAM T. BOLAND, JR.
WILLIAM T BOLAND JR KENYON & KENYONONE BROADWAYNEW YORK, NY 10004UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | CANNED AND FROZEN FOODS, NAMELY, MANDARIN ORANGES, PEACHES AND CRABMEAT | ABANDONED | Oct 15, 1976 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 6, 1991 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 3, 1991 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 3, 1991 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Nov 5, 1990 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 1990 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Aug 8, 1989 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 3, 1989 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 30, 1988 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 26, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 28, 1988 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 4, 1988 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Nov 23, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 23, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 21, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 9, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |