Drawing for TOTO

USPTO serial 73643504

TOTO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 1548862Status 900
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jul 25, 1989
Examiner
—
Law office
SCANNING ON DEMAND

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TOTO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

AUGUST G. MARON

GREGORY P GULIA DUANE MORRIS LLP380 LEXINGTON AVENEW YORK, NY 10168UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007MACHINE PARTS, NAMELY, BEARINGS, LAPPINGS AND POLISHING MACHINE PLATES, MECHANICAL SEALS, SPINDLES; MACHINE TOOLS AND PARTS THEREFOR FOR MAKING CERAMIC PLUMBING AND SANITARY FIXTURESEXPIREDApr 14, 1986
008SQUARESEXPIREDApr 14, 1986
009MEASURING TOOLS, NAMELY, LINEAR SCALES, PARALLEL BLOCKS AND SURFACE PLATES; ELECTRONIC PARTS, NAMELY, MAGNETIC HEADS AND AUDIO TAPE GUIDESEXPIREDApr 14, 1986
011ELECTRIC HEATING UNITS FOR DRYING FOODS, PHARMACEUTICALS, RESINOUS MATERIALS AND PAINTED COATINGSSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDApr 14, 1986
017NON-METALLIC SEALS AND RINGS FOR USE IN INDUSTRIAL MACHINES AND ELECTRONIC APPARATUS; CERAMIC NOZZLES FOR USE IN MACHINES, NON-STRUCTURAL CERAMIC PUMP AND VALVE PARTSSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDApr 14, 1986

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 28, 2010CAEXCANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9—
Sep 3, 2008CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Feb 7, 2008CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE—
Nov 26, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 24, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 12, 2002TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 30, 2000RNL1REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS)The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active.
Sep 30, 20009G8PREGISTERED - SEC. 9 GRANTED/CHECK RECORD FOR SEC. 8—
Aug 20, 1995C15PREGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Aug 20, 1995XXXXPOST REGISTRATION ACTION CORRECTION—
Dec 23, 1994815FREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED—
Jul 25, 1989R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
May 2, 1989PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 1, 1989NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 8, 1989CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 1, 1989CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Feb 1, 1989DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 3, 1989PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Nov 4, 1988CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 4, 1988PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Jun 16, 1988ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 6, 1987CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 8, 1987CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 12, 1987CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance