Drawing for REPUBLIC NATIONAL BANK OF MIAMI

USPTO serial 73643581

REPUBLIC NATIONAL BANK OF MIAMI

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
TAYLOR, CRAIG
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with REPUBLIC NATIONAL BANK OF MIAMI?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JESUS SANCHELIMA

235 S LE JEUNE RDMIAMI, FL 33134UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036BANKING SERVICES AND EXTENSION OF CREDIT TO CONSUMERS BY MEANS OF CREDIT CARDSACTIVENov 4, 1965

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 19, 2001ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Jul 19, 2001CU.TCONCURRENT USE TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Jul 19, 2001CU.DCONCURRENT USE DENIED NO. 999999—
Sep 19, 1989CU.ICONCURRENT USE PROC. INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Dec 20, 1988PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 21, 1988NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 20, 1988NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 20, 1988NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 31, 1988CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 31, 1988DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 7, 1988CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 25, 1988CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Nov 19, 1987CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 15, 1987CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 14, 1987CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Apr 27, 1987DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 23, 1987DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance