USPTO serial 73643581
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JESUS SANCHELIMA
235 S LE JEUNE RDMIAMI, FL 33134UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | BANKING SERVICES AND EXTENSION OF CREDIT TO CONSUMERS BY MEANS OF CREDIT CARDS | ACTIVE | Nov 4, 1965 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 19, 2001 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 19, 2001 | CU.T | CONCURRENT USE TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 19, 2001 | CU.D | CONCURRENT USE DENIED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 19, 1989 | CU.I | CONCURRENT USE PROC. INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 20, 1988 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 21, 1988 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 20, 1988 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 20, 1988 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 31, 1988 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 31, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 7, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 25, 1988 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 19, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 15, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 14, 1987 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 27, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 23, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |