Drawing for ENTREES BY MAIL

USPTO serial 73643773

ENTREES BY MAIL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SPARROW, MARY
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ENTREES BY MAIL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ARMAND CIFELLI

ARMAND CIFELLI KRAMER, BRUFSKY & CIFELLI, PC181 OLD POST RDP O BOX 59SOUTHPORT, CT 06490

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042FROZEN CONVENIENCE FOOD DELIVERY SERVICESABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 1, 1989DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 25, 1989EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Feb 23, 1989ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Feb 23, 1989EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Oct 24, 1988CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Jun 29, 1988EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jan 21, 1988CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 23, 1987CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 20, 1987CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 28, 1987DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance