USPTO serial 73643995
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
CASIO KEISANKI KABUSHIKI KAISHA
SHINJUKU-KU, TOKYO, JP
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ARTHUR SCHWARTZ
ARTHUR SCHWARTZ SCHWARTZ JEFFERY SCHWAAB MACK, ET ALP O BOX 299ALEXANDRIA, VA 22313UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | PORTABLE, HAND-HELD AUTOMATIC TELEPHONE DIALING APPARATUS SEPARATE AND DISTINCT FROM A TELEPHONE | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 27, 1989 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Feb 13, 1989 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 8, 1988 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Aug 25, 1988 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 9, 1987 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 19, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 17, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |