USPTO serial 73644299
SIDHU
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 23, 1988
- Examiner
- STRASER, RICHARD
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SIDHU?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
LANDSBERG/LECH, DE
LANDSBERG/LECH, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
STEPHEN H. FRISHAUF
STEPHEN H FRISHAUF FRISHAUF, HOLTZ, GOODMAN & WOODWARD30TH FL600 THIRD AVENEW YORK, NY 10016Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | COSMETIC; NAMELY HAIR TONICS, HAIR SPRAYS, HAIR SHAMPOOS, HAIR AND SKIN LOTIONS, GELS, CREAMS, OILS AND BATH OILS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 14, 1983 |
| 005 | MEDICATED COSMETIC PREPARATIONS FOR THE HAIR AND SKIN; NAMELY TINCTURES, OILS AND CREAMS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 14, 1983 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 27, 1995 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| May 4, 1989 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 27, 1989 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Aug 23, 1988 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jun 16, 1988 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 14, 1988 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 16, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 21, 1988 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 14, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 14, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 15, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 8, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 25, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 16, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 13, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |