USPTO serial 73644438
DICKENS WORLD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ZAK, HENRY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DICKENS WORLD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
PETER J. LYNFIELD
PETER J LYNFIELD ABELMAN FRAYNE REZAC & SCHWAB708 THIRD AVENEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | PAPER, CARDBOARD; PRINTED MATTER; BOOKS; MAGAZINES; BOOKBINDING MATERIAL; PHOTOGRAPHS; STATIONERY, ADHESIVES FOR STATIONERY AND HOUSEHOLD PURPOSES; ARTISTS' MATERIALS; PAINT BRUSHES; INSTRUCTIONAL AND TEACHING MATERIAL; PLASTIC MATERIALS FOR PACKAGING; PLAYING CARDS; PRINTERS' TYPE, PRINTING BLOCKS | ABANDONED | — |
| 028 | GAMES AND PLAYTHINGS; GYMNASTIC AND SPORTING ARTICLES; DECORATIONS FOR CHRISTMAS TREES | ABANDONED | — |
| 029 | MEAT, FISH AND POULTRY; MEAT EXTRACTS; PRESERVED, DRIED AND COOKED FRUITS AND VEGETABLES; JELLIES; JAMES; SALAD DRESSINGS | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 14, 1992 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 21, 1991 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 27, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 24, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 26, 1990 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 26, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 5, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 2, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 23, 1989 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 18, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 23, 1989 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 1, 1988 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 13, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 13, 1988 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 9, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 12, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |