USPTO serial 73644659
COINCARD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TINGLEY, JOHN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with COINCARD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
PERLA M. KUHN
PERLA M KUHN KUHN MULLER AND BAZERMAN1412 BROADWAYNEW YORK, NY 10018UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | ENCODED CARDS THAT CAN BE READ BY LASERS MAGNETIC-STRIP CARDS, IC-CHIP CARDS; NAMELY, CARDS IN WHICH INTEGRATED CIRCUIT CHIPS ARE BURIED CASH REGISTERS FOR PREPAID CARDS; COIN-OPERATED VENDING MACHINES FOR PREPAID CARDS; APPARATUS AND INSTRUMENTS FOR USE IN CONJUNCTION WITH COIN OPERATED VENDING MACHINES NAMELY, COIN MECHANISMS, BILL VALIDATORS, CARDS READER AND CARD WRITERS USED FOR READINGS, WRITING, CALCULATING AND ADJUSTING BALANCES OF PRE-PAID CARDS | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 22, 1991 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 11, 1990 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 24, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 6, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 15, 1988 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 10, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 14, 1987 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 13, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 22, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |